existence, or being ?

Since the fallen soul can no longer live in the reality of absolute being it enters a relative actuality, an intellectual existence in which it is constantly becoming and never being the being who it truly is in reality. The soul projects a negative image of its being, the idea of an individual self, into the actuality of civilization, the false reality of the city, where it is held captive, conditioned and deformed within an artificial environment from which there can be no escape without a faith which reintroduces the absolute, spiritual categories of being into the world of intellectual existence.

What is positive?

Pondering the conflict between positive and negative that characterizes the universe of relativity we need to ask “what is positive?” and “what is negative?” Current physical theory informs us that before the universe existed there was nothing, absolute, infinite and eternal zero. The nothing within existence is precisely nothing, it does not exist. The nothingness in which the universe of relativity came into existence is the nothingness of being, it simply is, absolute, infinite and eternal. Is the nothing within existence the same nothing that transcends existence? The universe, the one, the totality of things, appears to negate the zero of nothingness within relativity but cannot negate absolute nothingness in which the universe of relativity exists. Within relativity there exists the one and a zero but which is positive and which is negative?